HTML Preview Legal Complaint Cover Letter page number 1.
M
O
D
2
4
B
u
W
R
e
D
Th
U
wh
re
p
e
b
o
in
cr
e
x
in
A
s
C
e
R
i
t
h
W
n
o
in
C
o
se
(
C
d
e
C
o
a
d
C
R
fr
o
a
f
C
B
A
f
1
S
M
egan H. Ma
fficer of Ci
v
epartment
o
4
5 Murray L
a
u
ilding 410
W
ashington,
D
e
: Inade
scree
n
acces
s
ear Ms. Ma
c
h
e undersig
n
.
S. Customs
h
o flee to t
h
sulting in th
e
rsecution.
F
o
rder or poi
n
d
ividual to
U
edible fear i
n
x
pedited re
m
collaborati
o
s
sociation (
A
e
ntro Legal
d
i
ghts of the
S
h
e Immigrati
o
W
omen’s Re
fu
o
ncitizens
w
CBP’s scre
e
o
ncurrent
w
parately file
d
C
RC
L
) with
n
e
nied access
o
mplainants.)
d
ditional cas
e
R
CL acknow
l
o
m signator
y
f
fidavits exp
l
B
P’s screeni
f
fidavits.) Ba
s
S
e
e
8 U.S.C. §
1
ck
v
il Rights &
o
f Homelan
d
a
ne, S
W
D
.C. 20528
quate U.S.
n
ing practi
c
s
to the asy
l
c
k and Mr.
R
n
ed organiz
a
and Border
h
e United St
a
eir unjust e
x
F
ederal law
s
n
t of entry
e
U
.S. Citizen
s
n
terview, th
e
m
oval proces
o
n with Am
e
A
ILA), the
C
d
e la Raza,
H
S
an Francis
c
o
n Clinic o
f
fu
gee Com
m
h
o were de
n
e
ning proce
s
w
ith the filin
g
d
a submiss
i
n
ames and
A
to the asylu
m
AILA filed
e
s supplem
e
l
edging compl
a
y
organizati
o
l
aining their
n
g and refe
r
s
ed on the a
t
1
225
(
b)(1)(A)(
i
Civil Libert
i
d
Securit
y
Customs a
n
c
es block i
n
l
um proce
s
R
oth:
a
tions write
t
Protection
a
tes and are
x
pedited re
m
s
tates that w
h
e
xpresses a f
e
s
hip and Im
m
e
first step i
n
s.
1
T
he Nat
i
e
rican Gate
w
C
enter for
G
H
uman Rig
h
c
o Bay Area
f
the Univer
s
m
ission sub
m
n
ied the opp
s
s. (See Exs.
A
g
of the atta
c
i
on to the O
A
-numbers
f
m
process.
(
a similar co
m
e
nt that com
p
a
int filed on
N
o
ns and oth
e
firsthand o
b
r
ral procedu
r
t
tached co
m
i
i).
V
i
es
John
R
Inspe
c
Depa
r
245
M
Buildi
n
W
ashi
n
nd Border
P
n
dividuals
f
s
s
t
o raise con
c
(CBP) to pr
taken into
c
m
oval to cou
h
en an
i
ndi
v
fe
ar of perse
c
m
igration S
e
n
the asylu
m
i
onal Immig
r
w
ays, Ameri
c
G
ender & Re
h
ts First, La
w
(LCCR), th
e
s
ity of Texa
s
m
it th
i
s com
p
ortunity to
s
A-I, Individ
u
c
hed
i
ndivid
O
ffice of Civ
i
f
or addition
a
(
See Ex. J, A
m
plaint in
N
plaint. (See
E
N
ovember 26,
2
e
r legal serv
i
b
servations
o
r
es. (See Ex
s
m
plainants’ a
f
N
o
V
IA FEDE
X
R
oth
c
tor Genera
l
r
tment of H
o
M
urray Lane,
n
g 410
ngton, D.C.
P
rotection
f
leeing per
s
c
erns regard
i
r
operly scre
e
c
ustod
y
at t
h
u
ntries wher
e
v
idual appre
h
c
ution, CB
P
e
rvices (US
C
m
process fo
r
g
rant Justice
c
an Immigr
a
fugee Studi
e
w
yers’ Com
m
e Texas Civ
i
s
Law Scho
o
p
laint on be
h
s
eek asylum
u
al Complaint
s
ual complai
n
i
l Rights an
d
a
l
i
ndividual
s
A
ILA Chart
of
N
ovember 2
0
E
x. K, Lette
r
2
013). In ad
d
i
ce provider
s
o
f common
s
. L-P, Legal
f
fidavits, th
e
o
vember 13,
X
AND E-
M
l
o
meland Se
c
S
W
20528
(CBP)
s
ecution fr
o
i
ng the failu
e
n individua
l
h
e border,
e
they face
h
ended at t
h
P
must refer
C
IS) for a
r
those in t
h
Center (NIJ
a
tion Lawye
r
e
s (CGRS),
m
ittee for C
i
i
l Rights Pr
o
o
l, and the
h
alf of 9
because of
f
s
.
)
n
ts, AILA h
d
Civil Liber
t
s
who also
w
of
Individual
0
13, and the
r
to AILA fr
o
d
ition, advo
s
have prov
i
shortcomin
Service Provi
d
e
cases colle
c
2014
M
AIL
c
urit
y
o
m
re by
l
s
h
e
the
h
e
C),
r
s
i
vil
o
ject,
f
laws
as
t
ies
w
ere
se
o
m the
cates
i
ded
gs in
d
er
c
ted