Willekeurige case-analyse

Not based on any case or experience B8 GPR encouraged to express himself / herself GPR sometimes encouraged to express himself / herself GPR occasionally allowed to express himself / herself GPR rarely if ever permitted to express himself /herself B9 Trainer gives constructive, sensitive feedback, reinforcing strengths, helping GPR to tackle problems and uncertainty Trainer gives constructive feed-back, reinforcing strengths, some problems and uncertainties avoided Trainer gives constructive feedback sometimes, not always acknowledging strengths or uncertainties well Trainer does not give feedback, or gives it in a destructive manner, does not acknowledge strengths or uncertainties B10 Trainer challenges GPR constructively in order to expand thinking Some constructive challenge but some opportunities missed Trainer challenges very little, or does so in a slightly threatening way No challenge, or challenge appears threatening C Summing up and planning for the future C1 Useful summarising done by either trainer or GPR Summarising usually attempted, mostly useful Some attempt at summarising, may not be useful No evidence of summarising C2 Aims and plans for future learning discussed and recorded Some plans for future learning were discussed but not developed Plans for future learning implicit, or mentioned by trainer but not discussed Plans for future learning were not addressed C3 Explicit evaluation of discussion by GPR and trainer Some evidence of evaluation of discussion Evaluation implicit No evidence of any evaluation Total: Comments please give examples of good practice, and suggestions for how teaching might be improved: Please continue overleaf.